Expect More Delays As Johnson & Johnson Questions Expert Witnesses Credibility Part Two

Johnson & Johnson's strategy may be to intimidate plaintiff expert witnesses so that they are reluctant to testify against them in upcoming court cases

Friday, September 22, 2023 - In a strategic legal move that has garnered significant negative attention, Johnson & Johnson has taken an unconventional step by filing lawsuits against potential talcum powder cancer plaintiff expert witnesses, challenging their official studies and testing that allege a link between the use of Johnson's Baby Powder, made with talc, and Shower to Shower brand products. This aggressive approach is raising eyebrows within the legal and scientific communities, as it involves going after the very individuals who have provided crucial testimony in previous cases against the company. One of the most prominent experts targeted by these lawsuits is Dr. Jacqueline Moline, who has served as a plaintiffs' expert in over 200 cases alleging that J&J talc products caused cancer. This legal maneuver is sparking a contentious debate about the integrity of scientific research and its role in legal battles. Dr. Jacqueline Moline is a highly respected authority in the field of occupational medicine and epidemiology. Her impressive qualifications include currently being the Chairperson of the Department of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology, and Prevention at the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Health. Furthermore. Dr. Moline has held significant roles as the Director of Northwell Health Queens World Trade Center and as the Health Program Director of Occupational & Environmental Medicine at Long Island's Northwell Health, and has actively participated in previous court cases against Johnson & Johnson, and has established her as a pivotal expert witness in the ongoing legal disputes regarding the safety of talc-based products. Dr. Moline is currently a target along with several other potential expert witnesses against Johnson & Johnson in upcoming talcum powder cancer trials.

The lawsuits filed by Johnson & Johnson against Dr. Moline and other plaintiff scientific expert witnesses have triggered strong reactions. According to Reuters, Dr. Moline characterized these lawsuits as an attempt to "intimidate" scientific experts. This move by the pharmaceutical giant has prompted experts and legal scholars to question the boundaries of legal strategy in product liability cases. As Dr. Sheila Jasanoff, a prominent expert in science and technology studies, points out, "The use of lawsuits to challenge scientific experts can have a chilling effect on research and the willingness of experts to testify in cases where public health is at stake." Indeed, the broader implications of this legal strategy extend beyond the courtroom, potentially influencing the pursuit of scientific truth and the ability of experts to speak openly about their findings. While Johnson & Johnson argues that the scientific findings presented by Dr. Moline and other experts are flawed due to the possibility of prior asbestos exposure in some study participants, the legal community remains divided on the appropriateness of such lawsuits. Dr. Moline's extensive experience and reputation as an expert in her field have earned her credibility among her peers, which makes her a formidable figure in the ongoing litigation. As this legal battle unfolds, it raises profound questions about the intersection of science and the law and the extent to which corporations can challenge the credibility of scientific experts who raise concerns about the safety of their products. The outcome of these lawsuits may set important precedents and have a lasting impact on the way scientific expertise is treated within the legal system.

Information provided by TalcumPowderCancerLawsuit.com, a website devoted to providing news about talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits, as well as medical research and findings.